POST YOUR PERFORMANCE GAINS Go ahead and post your new attribute lines for players that achieved perf gains this year.
Please read the thread regarding PG rules in the Official Proclamations Forum before you post. forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=835" target="_blank">http://worldtecmofed.21.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=835
EX: Player A
MS: 63
REC: 75
Jerome Henderson DB
MS: 63
INT: 50
RS: 44
Robert Brooks WR
MS: 50
REC: 75
LordSummerisle- 04-19-2008
Desmond Howard:
MS: 63
REC: 44
Michael Irvin:
MS: 50
REC: 56
Greg Skrepenak:
HP: 56
Andy Heck:
MS: 50
Swamp Chicken- 04-19-2008
Finally got a gain that didnt age or something gay for the first time!!!
Jeffires:
MS: 56
RS: 44
altony2179- 04-19-2008
Ernest Givins
MS - 75* or RS - 56*
*Wouldn't this gain fall under the exceptional category considering Givins is the league's all-time leading receiver, had 500 MORE receiving yards than his closest pursuant last year and has received a gain 3 straight years?
Givins is already maxed out in every attribute. So why couldn't this go to the QB who gave him the ball despite having by far the best season a Grade C QB could have? Or even to another receiver for that matter?
LordSummerisle- 04-19-2008
Ernest Givins
MS - 75* or RS - 56*
*Wouldn't this gain fall under the exceptional category considering Givins is the league's all-time leading receiver, had 500 MORE receiving yards than his closest pursuant last year and has received a gain 3 straight years?
Givins is already maxed out in every attribute. So why couldn't this go to the QB who gave him the ball despite having by far the best season a Grade C QB could have? Or even to another receiver for that matter?
You said it, Givins is maxed out in every attribute. Hence no improvement for him is possible. What you need to keep in mind is that just by qualifying for the PG roll, you completely eliminated the chance that Givins could age or retire. THAT is the foremost benefit of the PG system for non-contracted, over-25 players.
Why couldn't it go to the QB? Because he didn't qualify, having been beaten by both Rodney Peete and Scott Mitchell. So Favre clearly did not have "the best season a Grade C QB could have." Why couldn't it go to another WR? They didn't earn the yardage!
Like I said, it may not APPEAR as though you are gaining anything by having Givins qualify for the PG...but if you hadn't...you could have seen him age or even retire. Which in my mind would be far more criminal. Also, by getting Givins the #1 spot in receiving yards, you ensured that no other WR in the league could get to 69 MS (excluding Rice who obviously started at that level).
opus- 04-19-2008
Jimmy Smith
MS: 56
BC: 81
I will let cpr and arncoem choose where they want the gains for Scott Mitchell and Amp Lee since I traded them before I doled out the PGs.
arncoem- 04-19-2008
AMP LEE:
RS - 44
MS - 50
sstruck2- 04-19-2008
New England Patriots
Burt Grossman
RS: 38
MS: 56
HP: 56
Pepper Johnson
RS: 38
MS: 56
HP: 69
Swamp Chicken- 04-19-2008
*Wouldn't this gain fall under the exceptional category considering Givins is the league's all-time leading receiver, had 500 MORE receiving yards than his closest pursuant last year and has received a gain 3 straight years?
Your SUCH an exaggerator!
He only beat Jeffires out by 496 yards ..NOT 500!!!
BigFatPaulie5- 04-19-2008
So why couldn't this go to the QB who gave him the ball despite having by far the best season a Grade C QB could have?
Um, I do believe there were 4 Grade C QB's who qualified, and Favre was 3rd out of 4, so I don't know where you are getting this.
k Ricky Watters
HP 56
REC 63
Kevin Smith
MS 63
HP 56
INT 56
lillefty021- 04-19-2008
God performance gains, ugh, woody should be in this section but he got fucked, just can't believe it... anyways my OL got PG'd.
Bruce matthews:
was 44 ms, 69 hp
now, 50ms, 69 hp
Leon Searcy:
was 31 ms, 56 HP
now, 31 ms, 63 HP
Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.
