Paulie(Browns) and KidPro(Raiders) Trade kidpro84 (9:36:13 PM): okie dokie.....send him freshly showered....so he doesnt smell like ohio
Monday September 17, 2007
BigFatPaulie5 (9:36:05 PM): lmao
BigFatPaulie5 (9:36:11 PM): ohio smells just fine
BigFatPaulie5 (9:36:19 PM): a little rusty but fine none the less
BigFatPaulie5 (9:36:55 PM): so we agree?
kidpro84 (9:38:03 PM): so Carrier to LA for fivestar's pick and my 1st rd pick next year
BigFatPaulie5 (9:38:01 PM): and my 5th rd picks
kidpro84 (9:38:17 PM): and your last rd pix to even the #'s
BigFatPaulie5 (9:38:22 PM): i am bigfats mcgee, and i agree to this trade
kidpro84 (9:38:46 PM): im the Kid and i agree
Paulie agrees to send DB Mark Carrier and the Browns 1991 and 1992 5th Round Picks in exchange for 5Star's 1st rd Pick (acquired via trade) and KidPro's 1992 1st Round Pick.
Jack Napier- 10-01-2007
i am Al Davis, an i agree
Palmer2ChadFor6- 01-03-2008
Isnt there only 4 rounds??
LordSummerisle- 01-03-2008
Let's just say "last" round.
This draft (1992) may actually have five rounds if I look at the number of retirements and feel it's necessary.
Palmer2ChadFor6- 01-03-2008
I like 5 rounds...aging and retirements are taking their toll!
BigFatPaulie5- 01-03-2008
This trade was made before we knew exactly how many rounds we were going to be drafting. In our deal, it was just assumed Kid would get my last rounds pick, whatever they happened to be. Since it was 4 rounds last year, he got my 4th round pick. If it is 5 rounds this year, he would get my 5th round pick.
bpkcchiefs- 01-03-2008
eh i dunno how thats fair....trades should be set in stone...not flexible like that... i dont care really...not like i have many draft picks for the draft anyways....just stating my opinion
brookstonfowler- 01-03-2008
Let's just say "last" round.
This draft (1992) may actually have five rounds if I look at the number of retirements and feel it's necessary.
i think with free agency and practice squads, 5 rounds shouldn't be necessary.
i understand that some people only have 1 practice squad member left, but that's mainly due to the fact they never drafted them in the initial 1990 draft; therefore, i think they should have to deal with the consequences of that. just my thoughts.
LordSummerisle- 01-03-2008
It isn't flexible if the teams agreed that it would be the "last round" pick traded, since they did not know how many rounds there would be. Clearly they assumed it was going to be 5 and it ended up 4 last year. This year it could end up 5 (probably not).
BigFatPaulie5- 01-03-2008
eh i dunno how thats fair....trades should be set in stone...not flexible like that... i dont care really...not like i have many draft picks for the draft anyways....just stating my opinion
Well like I stated earlier, it was our first WTF College Draft so we didn't know how many rounds we would have. The picks were just a throw in, so Kid would be able to field a full roster. I mean you should be happy. Your team has an extra last round selection.
bpkcchiefs- 01-03-2008
ah....eh...an extra last round pick...lol that gets my panties in a bunch...its all good
Palmer2ChadFor6- 04-06-2008
Lock
Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.